Performance in video mode was quite similar to stills mode, with the same good exposure and bright colors in daylight and under indoor conditions. In addition, they noticed a strong loss of detail when applying tele zoom because the device lacks a dedicated tele lens. Our testers found the Honor 90 to suffer from a local loss of texture, especially in low light. On the downside, the trade-off between detail retention and noise reduction could have been better. Most devices in the High-end segment come with less effective macro modes. Our experts particularly liked the Honor’s macro mode, which allowed the photographer to get close to the subject and was capable of capturing very good detail. Target exposure was accurate in most conditions, even in backlit scenes and other difficult lighting situations, and the autofocus was more consistent than on most other devices in this class. In our DXOMARK Camera tests, the Honor 90 delivered an overall strong performance, with some of the best results for photo exposure and autofocus that we have seen on a device in the High-end segment. Unwanted artifacts, such as aliasing, fusion artifact and ghosting.Sharpness differences between video frames.Frequent local loss of texture in low-light shots.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |